Skip to Content
Judiciary of the US Virgin Islands
Supreme Court
Superior Court
Supreme Court
of the
Virgin Islands
A+
A-
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
Judicial Home
Superior Court
About Us
Justices
Chief Justice Rhys S. Hodge
Associate Justice Maria M. Cabret
Associate Justice Ive Arlington Swan
Associate Justice Harold W.L. Willocks
Hours and Locations
Holidays
Contact Us
Administration
Offices of the Court
Office of Bar Admissions
Overview
Committee of Bar Examiners
Regular Admissions
Special Admissions
Pro Hac Vice Admissions
Bar Schedule of Fees
Office of the Clerk
Promulgation and Administrative Orders
Self Help Guide
Fee Schedule
Forms
Contact Us
Rules
Opinions
Oral Arguments Calendar
Court Calendars
Archived Court Calendars
Current Court Calendars
Judicial Home
Superior Court
About Us
Justices
Chief Justice Rhys S. Hodge
Associate Justice Maria M. Cabret
Associate Justice Ive Arlington Swan
Associate Justice Harold W.L. Willocks
Hours and Locations
Holidays
Contact Us
Administration
Offices of the Court
Office of Bar Admissions
Overview
Committee of Bar Examiners
Regular Admissions
Special Admissions
Pro Hac Vice Admissions
Bar Schedule of Fees
Office of the Clerk
Promulgation and Administrative Orders
Self Help Guide
Fee Schedule
Forms
Contact Us
Rules
Opinions
Oral Arguments Calendar
Court Calendars
Archived Court Calendars
Current Court Calendars
MENU
Supreme Court of the US Virgin Islands
»
Court Opinions
»
Published Opinions
»
In Re: Lambertsen
A+
A-
In Re: Lambertsen
Sub Menu
Skip Sidebar Navigation
In Re: Lambertsen
S. Ct. Crim. No. 2017-0043
Last item for navigation
Case Caption:
In Re: Lambertsen
Case Number:
SCT-CIV-2025-0205
Date:
08/20/2025
Author:
Per Curiam
Citation:
2025 VI 16
Summary:
Regarding a petition for writ of mandamus filed with the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands requesting that the Court order a Superior Court judge to (1) vacate that judge’s July 28, 2025 order denying the petitioner’s petition for writ of mandamus requesting that the Superior Court order the Virgin Islands Police Commissioner to approve the petitioner’s permit to carry a firearm, and (2) vacate that judge’s subsequent August 6, 2025 order denying petitioner’s motion to vacate the July 28, 2025 order, the petition only vaguely references various laws and does not explain how these laws relate to the issuance of a firearm license in the U.S. Virgin Islands, or establish that he has an indisputable right to receive one. Moreover, the petition does not explain why an appeal of the orders at issue would not provide an alternate means to obtain the relief petitioner seeks. A writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy which should be granted only in extraordinary circumstances, and a petitioner must establish that his or her right to the writ is clear and indisputable and that he or she has no other adequate means to attain the desired relief. Since the petitioner has not satisfied either of these prerequisites, the petition is denied.
Attachment:
Open Document or Opinion