In a suit alleging breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, and tortious interference with a contract, all relating to a terminated employment relationship, the Superior Court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the statute of limitations should not be subject to equitable tolling on the facts of this case, which involved a prior litigation between the parties. An exhaustive review of the evidence submitted discloses that the plaintiff's actions were not reasonable or in good faith, supporting the decision of the Superior Court to refrain from equitably tolling the statute of limitations. The Superior Court's grant of the defendant's motion for dismissal of this case with prejudice, is affirmed.