https://supreme.vicourts.org/cms/One.aspx?portalId=12810944&pageId=20021136 Upon consideration of a petition for a writ of mandamus to the Superior Court judge assigned to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by the petitioner in Riley v. Gov’t of the V.I., Super. Ct. Civ. No. 43/2019 (STT), asserting that the Superior Court judge has failed to rule on the merits of the habeas corpus petition for a nearly one and a half year period, the petition for mandamus is granted, and the Superior Court judge is directed to issue a final judgment in the underlying proceeding concerning the habeas corpus petition within 60 days or take other meaningful action to further disposition of petitioner’s case in that period. https://supreme.vicourts.org/cms/One.aspx?portalId=12810944&pageId=20453541 12810860_20453541 Wed, 04 Sep 2024 15:16:00 GMT Upon a petition for a writ of mandamus to the Superior Court judge assigned to the case of o Davis v. American Youth Soccer Organization, Super. Ct. Civ. No. 70/2009 (STT), asserting that the Nominal Respondent has failed to rule on numerous motions over a period of years, the petition is granted, and the Nominal Respondent is directed to issue rulings on all pending motions in the underlying proceeding within 60 days or take other meaningful action to further disposition of petitioner’s case in that period. https://supreme.vicourts.org/cms/One.aspx?portalId=12810944&pageId=20454397 12810860_20454397 Tue, 03 Sep 2024 12:46:00 GMT